Contradiction Record
A living contradiction entry that can connect to episodes as the show covers more Bible chapters.
Click any reference to jump to the claim section that uses it.
This contradiction record was seeded from the BibViz contradiction dataset and connected to Sacrilegious Discourse by shared Bible chapter coverage.
As new Bible-study episodes sync in from the podcast feed, this record will automatically surface matching episode pages where the referenced chapters are covered.
Competing Claims
Claim A argues "Both did," while Claim B argues "Only one did." Compare the passages under each side to see how the contradiction is being built.
Claim A
These references outline the "Both did" side of the contradiction so you can compare it against the opposing claim. This side pulls together 2 separate references.
Verse preview will load when you hover this reference.
Claim B
These references outline the "Only one did" side of the contradiction so you can compare it against the opposing claim.
Verse preview will load when you hover this reference.
Embedded Scholar Context
These videos are matched automatically from transcripts, titles, descriptions, and topic inference, then embedded here so you can compare the same Bible material without leaving the site.
don't think we have an accurate memory anywhere in the New Testament. Certainly it is not the combination of Matthew 27 and Acts one.…
esus call God “my God”? #maklelan2857 If Jesus is really God. Alright, let's see it. Then how come he says in Matthew chapter 27…
the residents of Jerusalem call this field of blood. Now, let's take a look at the other account. This is in Matthew chapter 27.…
Podcast Coverage
This record is in the database, but it has not been linked to a covered chapter yet. As new RSS Bible-study episodes are synced, matching chapter coverage will light up here automatically.
Attribution
Initial contradiction dataset seeded from BibViz and adapted into the Sacrilegious Discourse knowledge base. BibViz is licensed under CC BY-SA 3.0.
